Looking For a Deeper Dive?

Last week, I wrote “Want to Grow Leaders? Teach Them How to Elevate Their Peers.” It challenged the mental model that leading by example alone is enough to inspire people to follow you. That raises the question of how many other mental models we hold that are worth reexamining. Leadership is often less about what we know than about the assumptions we no longer question. Let’s take a moment to look in the mirror. Over time, success can harden into certainty. The leadership app

Over the years, I have had the privilege of teaching graduate students as an adjunct professor at Rutgers University and Seton Hall University. Every semester, a familiar pattern emerges. The students who earn the highest grades are not always the ones who leave the greatest impression. The students who stand out most are those who somehow make everyone around them better. They ask thoughtful questions that sharpen others’ thinking. They encourage quieter classmates to contri

Artificial intelligence is often framed as a technology story. Leaders talk about automation, efficiency, productivity, and scale. Those benefits are real. Tasks that once took hours can now be completed in minutes, even seconds. Research accelerates, and communication scales instantly. Workflows that once required layers of coordination are increasingly streamlined. Yet beneath the excitement surrounding AI lies a less-discussed reality: as organizations reduce the cost of e

Long before artificial intelligence transformed the workplace, before executive coaching became mainstream, and before leadership development became a global industry, two business visionaries from Wisconsin built systems around a deceptively simple idea: People perform better when they work together. At first glance, O. Alfred Granum and Robert Nourse had little in common. Granum helped transform the financial services industry through Northwestern Mutual, and Nourse founded

Modern CEOs are navigating one of the most disruptive periods in business history. Artificial intelligence is transforming workflows, industries are evolving overnight, employees are rethinking the meaning of work, and organizations are struggling to maintain trust, alignment, and adaptability amid constant change. At the same time, leaders are facing a quieter yet equally important challenge: information is expanding faster than wisdom. That is one reason Between Olympus and

For decades, leadership has been defined by the ability to set direction, make decisions, and drive execution. Leaders were expected to provide answers, resolve challenges, and ensure work moved forward efficiently. That model worked in environments where information flowed from the top, decisions were centralized, and work could be directed through clear lines of authority. Today, those conditions have changed. For the complete article, click here: https://ceoworld.biz/2026/

Teams that emphasize safety without equal attention to accountability and productivity often become comfortable but ineffective. Conversations remain open, yet they may lack the rigor needed to improve decisions. Feedback is shared, but often in ways that avoid discomfort rather than address it directly. Over time, this dynamic can lead to a subtle yet significant shift. The desire to maintain a positive environment begins to outweigh the need to challenge thinking. Consensu

The Illusion of Progress Most leadership teams leave meetings with a sense of accomplishment. The agenda has been covered, key issues discussed, and decisions made. There is clarity on priorities, alignment appears strong, and next steps are clearly outlined. In that moment, it feels like progress. To a degree, it is. Decisions matter. Clarity matters. Alignment matters. But none of those things, on their own, guarantees successful execution. The real test of a meeting is no

There is a deeply ingrained belief in organizations that assembling a team of highly capable, experienced individuals will lead to strong performance. The logic is intuitive. Smart people make good decisions, and good decisions should lead to strong outcomes. Yet many leadership teams that look exceptional on paper fail to deliver results commensurate with their potential. They are neither dysfunctional nor disengaged. In most cases, they work hard, collaborate regularly, and